1 ARTICLE ONE TO SECURE CONVENTION FOR CITIZENS UK HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 BRITISH VERSION UNITED KINGDOM STATUTE LAWS ENGLAND COMMONWEALTH

Struggle is the father of all things. It is not by the principles of humanity that man lives or is able to preserve himself above the animal world, but solely by means of the most brutal struggle. If you do not fight, life will never be won. - Adolf Hitler -

Take a look at the Articles below and contrast it with the European Convention of Human Rights, or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and you will see the rot setting in. The UK bangs the equality drum, but in reality is more like a Police State in the way it operates, according to cases that we are following and cite as examples. Ultimately, the ruling monarch is responsible for appointing a Government that provides an effective administration. Clearly, that is not the case as of June 2020.

An Act to give further effect to rights and freedoms guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights; to make provision with respect to holders of certain judicial offices who become judges of the European Court of Human Rights; and for connected purposes. [9th November 1998]

BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:-

S C H E D U L E S

Schedule 1

THE ARTICLES

PART I

THE CONVENTION

ARTICLE 1 - THERE IS NO ARTICLE 1

By this omission the United Kingdom is confirming that they have no intention of providing an effective remedy for its citizens.

There followed Legal Aid cuts, designed to imbalance the resources of defendants, remove funding for civil litigation, and so create an uneven playing field, contrary to Article 6, the right to a fair hearing.

There is no right of appeal in the UK. They employ a single judge, the object being to deprive certain appellants a chance to prove they have/had been wrongly convicted.

The state knows that during a trial, flaws in a case are often revealed during the revelations, that at the time of a conviction, are not obvious. The civil servant policy makers calculated (inhumanely) that they would prevent justice from being done, improve conviction rates for the media and re-election of politicians and reduce the justice bill - no matter that hundreds of wrongful convictions a year would never be corrected.

Appealing to the European Courts do not offer an effective remedy, where they also use a singe judge system to defeat legitimate claims, in the interest of reducing the backlog of cases and reducing the justice bill.

In March of 2018, barristers in the UK went on strike as to the collapsing of the British criminal justice system and legal aid reductions.

Sadly, this is all to do with borrowing that has taken the national debt to epic proportions. In essence, a bankrupt nation cannot afford to be honest in human rights terms. The typically British solution is not to curb over-spending on military might that is redundant in any event, but to make the weakest members of society suffer.

Marie Antoinette, last queen of France before the French Revolution: "We have no bread, let them eat cake."

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND SPEECH - This website is protected by Articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The Injustice Alliance avers that the right to impart information is a right, no matter that the method of communication is unpalatable to the State.